|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri January 8, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
had 2 years 235/85/16 on a 97 expedition. my brother has em in the wider style on a 97 stepside chevy ex cab. 4 of us wen muddin in the clay. only one didnt get stuck. had 2 blizzards this year had to make a 300 mile round trip through both of them. no problems. they dig dig dig. wear very very well 20k miles and still bout 70 percent life left. only complaint is if you like rappin it out spinnin and sliddin in mud/clay with the ocasional rocks underneath it will chew a little piece out of a lug here and there. i have skinny tires too tho on a 6200 lb truck (when its full of fuel with me in it). am looking for a similar tire with deeper tread depth closest i found is the federal couragia m/t. gotta check the price on those though. might be getting these again.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Sat January 9, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 0
|
|
read reviews on the federal couragia seems like alot of complaints of wearing really fast. and they arent any deeper. tread starts at 19/32 on mine 21/32 i think in some of the wider ones. im goin with the traildiggers again.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Sun March 7, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Ten times better then a BFG the tread has grate clean out can't even hear them when 80KM
|
|
Cons:
|
Suck on ice and wearing down fast pulling my trailer on the tare chip roads
|
|
I got 285/75R16 on my 94 Ram 2500 I dot think that they will last to long I pull a 20' float and I can see them starting to chip a way fast on the back only got 5000 km on them
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri April 9, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
good tire, great in mud, great in sand, great in snow sing loud
|
|
Cons:
|
none they're the shit
|
|
ive got a set of them on my ranger and it goes through the river bottoms just as good as the bigger trucks with pro comps do. ive put 3000 on them and they havent worn hardly any at all. these are what im gettin from now on
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri April 16, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Does everything well
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
I have a set (including spare) of 285/75/16 T/D's on my 08 Fj. Drove the Fj to Moab from Washington state and wheeled in Moab. Got a lot of questions and compliments on the tires. They did awesome in Moab and in the snow and mud this winter. This is a great tire. I have 14,000 miles on mine and they still have plenty of tread. I will definately buy this tire again.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri August 6, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great all around tire with excelent mud and snow traction.
|
|
Cons:
|
Harder to find in some locations.
|
|
I have put a little over 50K on them. Mostly hard street driving and ocasional abusive wheeling. There is still some good life left in them. Love the ten ply rating and ability to resist nail punctures.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri September 24, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
everything
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
On my second set of tires. 1st set was 265/70/17 on my 2005 gmc z71 and they lasted 2 yrs. got 33/12.5/17 and had them for 1 yr and not even worn half way thru. sand, snow, or slushy mud never stood a chance. paid 600 for my first set and 700 for my 33's
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Tue September 28, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 2
|
|
Pros:
|
great traction clean good look awesome
|
|
Cons:
|
wear like shit on pavement and gravel
|
|
Have a set of 285 75 16 on a 07 Chevy 2500HD running some gravel mainly highway got 17000 miles on them and are completely bald
|
|
foroffroad
Registered: October 2010
Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: Thu October 28, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid (per item)?: $240.00
| Rating: 0
|
|
Pros:
|
They go through mud well
|
|
Cons:
|
They do imbed slashes and breakages
|
|
Last week I noticed that there is a slash in the rear tire with some breakage in the lugs. It is bad. I only put these tires on my truck 6 months ago! I have never seen this before. And the manufacturer doesn't warranty this even though they claim otherwise!
Plus they are wearing down quickly.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri December 10, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? No |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 3
|
|
Pros:
|
nice looking
|
|
Cons:
|
ware really bad
|
|
had a set of 35x12.5x17 on my 09 dodge ram, they looked really nice but thats about it. they were really loud at all speeds and the nice big tread dont last very long. had them on the truck for one year with about 22,000kms, tread ware was very uneven, i rotated the tires every 2500 to 3000 kms. was not happy, about 30% tread left on tires when i changed them, trying Hankook Dnpro M/T this time. time will tell.
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Mon December 20, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: $190.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
great traction
|
|
Cons:
|
lugs tear
|
|
Lugs cut on sharp flint rock- it is rubber. great traction nice ride noise not so bad
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Sun January 2, 2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid (per item)?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
great in the mud and snow,wearing very slow
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
i drive in all kinds of stuff i will get them again.running on a 03 dodge dakota for what i do there are great
|
|
